Creveling v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE

196 P.3d 133, 164 Wash. 2d 1024
Washington Supreme Court·Decided October 1, 2008·No. 81466-0·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

196 P.3d 133 (2008)
164 Wash.2d 1024

David W. CREVELING, Petitioner,
Dianna Creveling, Plaintiff,
v.
THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, Respondent.

No. 81466-0.

Supreme Court of Washington.

October 1, 2008.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Alexander and Justices C. Johnson, Sanders, Owens and J. Johnson, at its October 1, 2008, Motion Calendar, considered whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is denied. The Petitioner's motion to consider additional evidence is also denied.

/s/ Gerry L. Alexander Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Creveling v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, 196 P.3d 133, 164 Wash. 2d 1024 (Wash. 2008).

196 P.3d 133 (Creveling v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gourley v. 180SOLUTIONS, INC.
196 P.3d 133 (Washington Supreme Court, 2008)