Home/Washington Supreme Court/Creveling v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE

Creveling v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE

196 P.3d 133, 164 Wash. 2d 1024
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 1, 2008
Docket81466-0
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 196 P.3d 133 (Creveling v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Creveling v. WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, 196 P.3d 133, 164 Wash. 2d 1024 (Wash. 2008).

Opinion

196 P.3d 133 (2008)
164 Wash.2d 1024

David W. CREVELING, Petitioner,
Dianna Creveling, Plaintiff,
v.
THE WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF FISH AND WILDLIFE, Respondent.

No. 81466-0.

Supreme Court of Washington.

October 1, 2008.

ORDER

¶ 1 Department I of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Alexander and Justices C. Johnson, Sanders, Owens and J. Johnson, at its October 1, 2008, Motion Calendar, considered whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b), and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶ 2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶ 3 That the Petition for Review is denied. The Petitioner's motion to consider additional evidence is also denied.

/s/ Gerry L. Alexander Chief Justice

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gourley v. 180SOLUTIONS, INC.
196 P.3d 133 (Washington Supreme Court, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
196 P.3d 133, 164 Wash. 2d 1024, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/creveling-v-washington-state-department-of-fish-and-wildlife-wash-2008.