Cretchen v. Winona Railroad Co.

199 N.E. 241, 209 Ind. 414
CourtIndiana Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 14, 1936
DocketNo. 26,379.
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 199 N.E. 241 (Cretchen v. Winona Railroad Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Indiana Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cretchen v. Winona Railroad Co., 199 N.E. 241, 209 Ind. 414 (Ind. 1936).

Opinion

Hughes, J.

This was an action by appellant against the appellee to recover damages for personal injuries received while a passenger on one of the trains of appellee. A demurrer’ was sustained to the amended complaint of appellant, and, refusing to plead further, judgment was rendered in favor of appellee.

The complaint on its face -shows that the cause of action was for injuries to the person and that it occurred more than two years before the beginning of the action. It is alleged that the injury to the appellant was received on October 24, 1927, and the complaint was filed on December 17, 1931. Therefore the statute of limitations had run on the cause of action. §302, Burns 1926, §2-602, Burns 1933, §61, Baldwin’s 1934. The demurrer was properly sustained.

Even though the demurrer was improperly sustained, the appellant could not prevail in this appeal. He has made no effort to comply with the rules of this court in preparing his brief. He did not set out any propositions, points, and authorities as provided for under rule 21. Apparently no good faith effort was made to comply with said rule.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Robinson v. Mittry Bros.
94 P.2d 99 (New Mexico Supreme Court, 1939)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
199 N.E. 241, 209 Ind. 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cretchen-v-winona-railroad-co-ind-1936.