Crestar Bank v. Chickosky, No. Cv94 0704959 (Aug. 23, 1994)

1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 8542
CourtConnecticut Superior Court
DecidedAugust 23, 1994
DocketNo. CV94 0704959
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 8542 (Crestar Bank v. Chickosky, No. Cv94 0704959 (Aug. 23, 1994)) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Connecticut Superior Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crestar Bank v. Chickosky, No. Cv94 0704959 (Aug. 23, 1994), 1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 8542 (Colo. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]MEMORANDUM OF DECISION The court grants the motion to reconsider.

This is an action in replevin under C.G.S. Chapter 921. Section 52-522 of that chapter provides that in such an action "no cause of action, except of replevin or for a conversion . . ., may be stated."

This is an action in rem.

The boat in question is mortgaged under the Ship Mortgage Act, 4B U.S.c. § 951. "[T]he jurisdiction to foreclose the lien of the mortgage and to determine its priority in relation to other liens in a proceeding in rem CT Page 8543 is made exclusive [in the federal courts] by the Act."Reedsburg Bank v. Apollo, 508 F.2d 995, 999.

The court denies the relief requested.

N. O'Neill, J.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1994 Conn. Super. Ct. 8542, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crestar-bank-v-chickosky-no-cv94-0704959-aug-23-1994-connsuperct-1994.