Cressey v. Bradford

45 Me. 16
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine·Decided July 1, 1858·Published

Opinion

Rice, J.

This is an action of trespass quare clausum. The facts are the same as reported in the case, Bradford v. Cressey, ante, page 9, so far as the same are applicable. From that report, it appears that the defendant had been in the possession of the premises, which he is not charged with having entered unlawfully, more than six years. Under our Statute c. 145, he is entitled to betterments. In such case, trespass cannot be maintained. Chadbourne v. Straw, 22 Maine, 450; Paine v. Marr, 35 Maine, 181. Plaintiff nonsuit.

Tenney, O. J., Appleton, Hathaway, Cutting, and Goodenow, J. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cressey v. Bradford, 45 Me. 16 (Me. 1858).

45 Me. 16 (Cressey v. Bradford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.