Crespo v. Stapf

New Jersey Superior Court App Division

Crespo v. Stapf

591 A.2d 277, 248 N.J. Super. 349, 1991 N.J. Super. LEXIS 168

CourtNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

DecidedMay 23, 1991

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 591 A.2d 277 (Crespo v. Stapf) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crespo v. Stapf, 591 A.2d 277, 248 N.J. Super. 349, 1991 N.J. Super. LEXIS 168 (N.J. Ct. App. 1991).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary judgment of the Law Division entered in favor of defendants Josef Stapf and Josef Stapf [350]*350Maschinenbeau dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Nelson Crespo in this product liability action substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Wefing in her written opinion which is reported as Crespo v. Stapf, 242 N.J.Super. 254, 576 A.2d 346 (Law Div.1990). We are satisfied from our study of the record and the arguments presented that the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of defendants and that all of the issues of law raised are clearly without merit. R. 2:11-3(e)(l)(E). See also Juzwin v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd., 900 F.2d 686 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 246, 112 L.Ed.2d 204 (1990).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the summary judgment of the Law Division entered in favor of defendants Josef Stapf and Josef Stapf [350]*350Maschinenbeau dismissing the complaint of plaintiff Nelson Crespo in this product liability action substantially for the reasons expressed by Judge Wefing in her written opinion which is reported as Crespo v. Stapf, 242 N.J.Super. 254, 576 A.2d 346 (Law Div.1990). We are satisfied from our study of the record and the arguments presented that the trial court properly granted summary judgment in favor of defendants and that all of the issues of law raised are clearly without merit. R. 2:11-3(e)(l)(E). See also Juzwin v. Asbestos Corp., Ltd., 900 F.2d 686 (3d Cir.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 111 S.Ct. 246, 112 L.Ed.2d 204 (1990).

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

591 A.2d 277, 248 N.J. Super. 349, 1991 N.J. Super. LEXIS 168, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crespo-v-stapf-njsuperctappdiv-1991.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack