Crespin, Jeremy

• Court: Texas Supreme Court
• Decided: January 12, 2015
• Docket: WR-82,141-03
• Status: Published

Opinion

Jeremy Crespin TDCJ No. 1807429 Hughes Unit JAN 12 2015 Rt. 2, Box 4400 Gatesville, TX 76597

Able Acosta, Cler^1 ACOS!a,Ctertt Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas P.O. Box 12308 Austin, TX 78711 Januray 5, 2015

RE: WR-82,141-03 & WR-82, 141-04

Dear Clerk:

Please find enclosed copies of documents for both of the above case numbers. The writ record in WR-82,141-4 has not yet been forwarded >to this Court. However, Rule 73 of the Texas Rules of Appellate Proceudre now requires the convicting court to forward to this Court any Orders Designating Issues. I have included that Order herein for the Court's records and it should create a new case number for that writ application.

Please find enclosed the following documents to FILE in

* the record of case number WR-82,141-04:

1) State's Proposed Order Designating Issues 2) Respondent's Answer (Trial Counsel's Affidiavit) 3) Applicant's PRO SE Motion to STRIKE Trial Counsel's Response and for a Live Evidentiary Hearing J^co ?1^). Please find enclosed the following document to FILE in the record d of case number, WR-82 ,14103

1) Applicant's PRO SE REPLY to Court of Criminal Appeals' Order Dated December 17, 2014 That 1994 Law Applies and That the Juvenile Court Only Transferred Conduct When Applicant Was 16 Years Old. These documents were FILED in the convicting court; however, I'm worried that court will not forward these documents to this Court that is why I am providing a copy.

Thank YOU for your time and assistance in this matter. Respectfully,

Jeremy/Crespin (j J Applicant PRO SE JC/swd cc: District Court (363rd) Dallas County District Attorney FILE CAUSE NO. F08-16204-W F08-16205-W 20WOEC 19 PM |.-22 rd STATE OF TEXAS IN THE 363™ JUDICIAL GAR hTZS^owq L'«lLA5 CO , Try ac; V. DISTRICT COURT OF _

JEREMY CRESPIN DALLAS COUNTY, TEXAS

RESPONDENT'S ANSWER

STATE OF TEXAS

COUNTY OF DALLAS

TO THE HONORABLE JUDGE OF SAID COURT:

COMES NOW PAUL BRAUCHLE, respondent in the above numbered cause and makes

this his response to the Defendant's Writ and would show the Court as follows;

Movant would have the Court believe that I forced the Movant to accept a probation in his

cause and forced him to plead to the offenses he was charged with..

Rather than attempt to answer the hundred or so pages of mendacity, I would ask the Court

to revisit the plea of the Defendant and his answers to the questions asked of him in regard

to his case. I was able to secure him a five year probation which he quickly violated. His

complaints could be directed toward his revocation attorney or himself. A transcript of the

Defendant's plea is attached for the Court's perusal.

FURTHUR AFFIANT SAITH NOT.

PAULBRAUCHLE

On this the jlfj) day ofDecember, 2014, appeared Paul Brauchle, who after being duly Sworn stated that the forgoing fact are true and correct. wtfiflOT«awwws«p>fti*ww

LETICIA RUBIO Notary Public for Dallas County, Texas «*«•f\ Notary Public. State of Texas ^inj, My Commission Expires Vi'- November 08, 2017 KgX