Crespi v. Crespi
This text of 238 A.D. 794 (Crespi v. Crespi) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Order denying motion to dismiss the complaint affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, with leave to defendants to answer within ten days from the entry of the order herein. If the business of the partners was conducted by means of a corporation the plaintiff may not have an accounting. (Boag v. Thompson, 208 App. Div. 132.) The complaint does not make it clear. A trial will be necessary. Lazansky, P. J., Carswell, Scudder and Davis,'JJ., concur; Kapper, J., dissents on authority of Boag v. Thompson (supra); Brock v. Poor (216 N. Y. 387), and Jackson v. Hooper (76 N. J. Eq.. 592, 598).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
238 A.D. 794, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crespi-v-crespi-nyappdiv-1933.