Cresong v. Nevil

51 A.D.2d 1096, 381 N.Y.S.2d 355, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11950
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 25, 1976
StatusPublished
Cited by11 cases

This text of 51 A.D.2d 1096 (Cresong v. Nevil) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Cresong v. Nevil, 51 A.D.2d 1096, 381 N.Y.S.2d 355, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11950 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1976).

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered December 3, 1975 in Otsego [1097]*1097County, which dismissed appellant’s petition for an order dismissing all outstanding warrants and detainers lodged against him. The appellant in his petition sought an order dismissing certain out-of-State detainers or warrants filed against him while he was being held prisoner by the respondent, Sheriff, in Otsego County pending disposition of charges against him based upon a charge or charges of criminal activity in the County of Otsego. He was held by the Sheriff from about December 14, 1974 until he was sentenced on or about June 16, 1975 at which time the Sheriff transported him to a State correctional facility to begin service of his sentence. Special Term found that the provisions of the Interstate Compact on Detainers set forth in CPL 580.20 do not become applicable until a prisoner commences service of a term of imprisonment. In this case the appellant did not commence service of his term of imprisonment at any time while he was held in custody by the Sheriff. Accordingly, Special Term’s dismissal of the petition was appropriate because the petition does not state facts showing a right to relief. Judgment affirmed, without costs. Koreman, P. J., Sweeney, Mahoney, Larkin and Herlihy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hargrove
45 P.3d 376 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 2002)
People v. Reilly
136 A.D.2d 355 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Santos
135 Misc. 2d 51 (New York Supreme Court, 1987)
People v. Pellegrino
131 Misc. 2d 118 (New York Supreme Court, 1986)
People ex rel. Albuequrque v. Ward
116 Misc. 2d 634 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)
People v. Gabbidon
116 Misc. 2d 127 (New York Supreme Court, 1982)
Commonwealth v. Hude
397 A.2d 772 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1979)
United States v. Robert Dobson
585 F.2d 55 (Third Circuit, 1978)
Christian v. United States
394 A.2d 1 (District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 1978)
People v. Lublin
62 A.D.2d 1022 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
United States v. Wardell Byron Harris, Jr.
566 F.2d 610 (Eighth Circuit, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
51 A.D.2d 1096, 381 N.Y.S.2d 355, 1976 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 11950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cresong-v-nevil-nyappdiv-1976.