Creshenda McCaskill v. Selence Finance
Opinion
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
ATLANTA,____________________ May 10, 2016
The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order:
A16A1516. CRESHENDA MCCASKILL v. SELENCE FINANCE.
This case originated as a dispossessory proceeding in magistrate court. After an adverse ruling in the magistrate court, Creshenda McCaskill appealed to the superior court. The superior court issued its final order incorporating the parties’ mediation agreement, in which the parties agreed McCaskill would vacate the property. Thereafter, McCaskill filed this direct appeal. We, however, lack jurisdiction.
Because the superior court’s order disposed of a de novo appeal from a magistrate court decision, McCaskill was required to follow the discretionary appeal procedure. See OCGA § 5-6-35 (a) (1); English v. Delbridge, 216 Ga. App. 366, 367 (454 SE2d 175) (1995). McCaskill’s failure to follow this procedure deprives us of jurisdiction to consider this appeal, which is hereby DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction.
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia 05/10/2016
Clerk’s Office, Atlanta,____________________ I certify that the above is a true extract from the minutes of the Court of Appeals of Georgia.
Witness my signature and the seal of said court hereto affixed the day and year last above written.
, Clerk.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Creshenda McCaskill v. Selence Finance (Creshenda McCaskill v. Selence Finance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.