Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Crescent Puritan Laundry Co. v. McNamara

Crescent Puritan Laundry Co. v. McNamara

254 A.D. 646, 3 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6867
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 25, 1938
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 254 A.D. 646 (Crescent Puritan Laundry Co. v. McNamara) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crescent Puritan Laundry Co. v. McNamara, 254 A.D. 646, 3 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6867 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1938).

Opinion

Order so far as appealed from affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. Memorandum: We do not find our decision in Gibbs v. Sokol (216 App. Div. 260) controlling under the circumstances here shown. However, the motion called for an exercise of discretion and required all circumstances to be taken into consideration. (Van Devort v. K. & H. Evaporating Co., Inc., 252 App. Div. 8.) No absolute rule is to be laid down in this type of motion and we do not find an abuse of discretion in the order now before us. All concur. (The portion of the order appealed from determines the plaintiff in a consolidated action.) Present — Sears, P. J., Crosby, Lewis, Cunningham and Taylor, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

City of Salamanca v. Rocell Construction Co.
24 Misc. 2d 547 (New York Supreme Court, 1960)
Lehman v. Dictograph Products, Inc.
5 A.D.2d 688 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
254 A.D. 646, 3 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1938 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6867, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crescent-puritan-laundry-co-v-mcnamara-nyappdiv-1938.