Crescent Manufacturing Company v. Commissioner Of Internal Revenue
This text of 181 F.2d 185 (Crescent Manufacturing Company v. Commissioner Of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
181 F.2d 185
50-1 USTC P 9288
CRESCENT MANUFACTURING COMPANY; Mary Nagel, Transferee; Glen
B. Pfefferle, Transferee; Edith Pfefferle, Transferee;
Estate of Bertha Brown, Deceased, William H. Brown,
Administrator de bonis non with the Will Annexed,
Transferee; Estate of Theodore J. Brown, Deceased, Marion E.
Brown, Executrix, Transferee; Estate of R. H. Brown,
Deceased, William H. Brown, Administrator de bonis non with
the Will Annexed, Transferee, Petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
No. 10874.
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.
April 20, 1950.
Harry S. Bugbee, Toledo, Ohio, for petitioners.
Theron L. Caudle, Charles Oliphant, Rollin H. Transue, Ellis N. Slack, Henel Goodner, and George D. Webster, Washington, D.C., for respondent.
Before MARTIN, McALLISTER, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The above cause coming on to be heard upon the transcript of the record, the briefs of the parties, and the arguments of counsel, and the court being duly advised,Now, therefore, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed that the decision appealed from by and the same is hereby affirmed, in accordance with the findings of fact and opinion of the Tax Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
181 F.2d 185, 39 A.F.T.R. (P-H) 340, 1950 U.S. App. LEXIS 4132, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crescent-manufacturing-company-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-ca6-1950.