Crescent Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Rotherum
This text of 218 F.2d 638 (Crescent Lumber & Shingle Co. v. Rotherum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant, a Washington corporation, sued defendants, resident citizens of Texas, upon a sworn account1 for materials (lumber) furnished in the amount of $2,-767.45, and $500 alleged to be reasonable attorney’s fees. The trial court dis[639]*639missed the complaint for want of jurisdiction, on the theory that the attorney’s fees were not recoverable, and therefore the amount in controversy did not exceed $3,000, exclusive of interest and costs. This was error.
Article 2226, Vernon’s Civil Statutes, as amended Acts 1953, 53rd Leg., p. 101, ch. 67, § 1, clearly provides for recovery of reasonable attorney’s fees, in addition to the claim and costs, on valid claims for, among other things, materials furnished, or suits founded upon a sworn account or accounts.2 This right to reasonable attorney’s fees, in addition to the claim and costs, is a liability properly enforceable in a federal court, to be included in determining the amount in controversy. Missouri State Life Ins. Co. v. Jones, 290 U.S. 199, 54 S.Ct. 133, 78 L.Ed. 267.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
218 F.2d 638, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crescent-lumber-shingle-co-v-rotherum-ca5-1955.