Crescent Insurance v. W. R. Moore & Co.

63 Miss. 419
CourtMississippi Supreme Court
DecidedApril 15, 1886
StatusPublished
Cited by6 cases

This text of 63 Miss. 419 (Crescent Insurance v. W. R. Moore & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Mississippi Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crescent Insurance v. W. R. Moore & Co., 63 Miss. 419 (Mich. 1886).

Opinion

Arnold, J.,

delivered the opinion of the court.

An insurance company may be garnished as the debtor of a person whom it has insured, after loss has occurred under a policy which it has issued to such person, whether the claim for such loss has been adjusted or not. Drake on Attachment, 5th ed., § 549, and authorities there cited.

The proof on the trial of the issue raised by controverting appellant’s answer • showed,- prima fade, at least, liability on the part of appellant to Black & Sudduth. If appellant had any defense against the claim of Black & Sudduth it should have been made on that issue; but none was attempted' to be made on that issue, and no valid reason is shown why it was not done.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Briggs v. Benjamin
467 So. 2d 932 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1985)
American Nat. Ins. Co. v. United States Fidelity & G. Co.
215 So. 2d 245 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1968)
Ackerman v. Tobin
22 F.2d 541 (Eighth Circuit, 1927)
Finch v. Great American Insurance
125 A. 628 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1924)
Meridian Land & Industrial Co. v. Ormond
82 Miss. 758 (Mississippi Supreme Court, 1903)
Sexton v. Phoenix Ins.
132 S.E. 479 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1903)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
63 Miss. 419, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crescent-insurance-v-w-r-moore-co-miss-1886.