Crescent Heights XLVI, Inc. v. Sea-Air Towers Condominium Ass'n
729 So. 2d 420, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1494, 1999 WL 72451
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 17, 1999·No. No. 98-3781·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinion
We grant the defendant’s petition for writ of prohibition to disqualify the presiding judge. The order granting the plaintiffs motion for temporary injunction included a direction to the plaintiff to amend its complaint to add a count for reformation. Plaintiff had not sought leave to amend its complaint. By offering legal advice to the plaintiff, the judge raised concern about his impartiality sufficient to require his disqualification. See Chastine v. Broome, 629 So.2d 293 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crescent Heights XLVI, Inc. v. Sea-Air Towers Condominium Ass'n, 729 So. 2d 420, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 1494, 1999 WL 72451 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
729 So. 2d 420 (Crescent Heights XLVI, Inc. v. Sea-Air Towers Condominium Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
ROMAN CABRIANO v. STATE OF FLORIDA
District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2021
Blackpool Associates, Ltd. v. SM-106, Ltd.
839 So. 2d 837 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Cammarata v. Jones
763 So. 2d 552 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)