Crescent Foundry Co. v. United States

1999 CIT 5
United States Court of International Trade·Decided January 8, 1999·No. 95-09-01239·Published

Opinion

Slip Op. 99-5

UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE

CRESCENT FOUNDRY CO. PVT. LTD., NANDIKESHWARI PVT. LTD., CARNATION ENTERPRISES PVT. LTD., KEJRIWAL IRON & STEEL WORKS, OVERSEAS IRON FOUNDRY PVT. LTD., RAGHUNATH PRASAD PHOOLCHAND LTD., R.B. AGARWALLA & COMPANY, RSI (INDIA) PVT. LTD., SERAMPORE INDUSTRIES PVT. LTD., SITARAM MADHOGARHIA & SONS PVT. LTD., SUPER CASTINGS (INDIA), TIRUPATI INTERNATIONAL (P) LTD., UMA IRON & STEEL CO. and KAJARIA IRON CASTINGS PVT. LTD., BEFORE: DiCarlo, Senior Judge Plaintiffs, Ct. No. 95-09-01239 v.

UNITED STATES,

Defendant,

ALHAMBRA FOUNDRY, INC., ALLEGHENY FOUNDRY CO., DEETER FOUNDRY, INC., EAST JORDAN IRON WORKS, INC., LEBARON FOUNDRY INC., MUNICIPAL CASTINGS, INC., NEENAH FOUNDRY CO., U.S. FOUNDRY & MANUFACTURING CO., and VULCAN FOUNDRY, INC.,

Defendant-Intervenors.

ORDER

In conformity with the order and opinion of the United

States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit, it is hereby 95-09-01239 Page 2

ORDERED that this action is remanded to the United States

Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration for

further proceedings in conformity with the order and opinion of

the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit; and

it is further

ORDERED that Commerce shall file its remand results with

the court within 45 days of the date of this order; and it is

further

ORDERED that any party contesting the remand results shall

file comments with the court within 30 days of the remand

results.

SO ORDERED.

Dominick L. DiCarlo Senior Judge

Dated: New York, New York January 8, 1999

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Crescent Foundry Co. v. United States, 1999 CIT 5 (cit 1999).

1999 CIT 5 (Crescent Foundry Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.