Crescencio Taboada v. State
Opinion
Order entered January 7, 2014
In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01243-CR
CRESCENCIO TABOADA, Appellant
V.
THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee
On Appeal from the Criminal District Court No. 1 Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. F11-60224-H
ORDER Because the supplemental clerk’s record filed June 11, 2013 does not contain a certified,
signed, and detailed itemization of the costs assessed in this case, we ORDER the Dallas County
District Clerk to file a second supplemental record. See TEX. CODE CRIM. PROC. ANN. arts.
103.001 (West 2006) (“A cost is not payable by the person charged with the cost until a written
bill is produced or is ready to be produced, containing the items of cost, signed by the officer who
charged the cost or the officer who is entitled to receive payment for the cost.”) (emphasis
added); 1003.006 (“If a criminal action or proceeding . . . is appealed, an officer of the court
shall certify and sign a bill of costs stating the costs that have accrued and send the bill of cost to
the court to which the action or proceeding is . . . appealed.”) (emphasis added). The Dallas
County District Clerk shall file the supplemental record no later than January 10, 2014. We DIRECT the Clerk to send copies of this order, by electronic transmission, to Gary
Fitzsimmons, Dallas County District Clerk; the Dallas County District Clerk’s Office, Criminal
Records Division; and counsel for all parties.
/Jim Moseley/ JIM MOSELEY PRESIDING JUSTICE
.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crescencio Taboada v. State (Crescencio Taboada v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.