Cres Jewelry Factory, Inc. v. Good-Land Management Corp.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cres Jewelry Factory, Inc. v. Good-Land Management Corp.

240 A.D.2d 218, 658 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6166

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 10, 1997

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 240 A.D.2d 218 (Cres Jewelry Factory, Inc. v. Good-Land Management Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cres Jewelry Factory, Inc. v. Good-Land Management Corp., 240 A.D.2d 218, 658 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6166 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered September 13, 1996, which granted the motion of defendants Good-Land Management Corp. and Abacus Federal Savings Bank and the cross motion of defendant Mott & Prince Services Corp. for partial summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly granted the cross motions to dismiss the punitive damages claim since the record is devoid of evidence of malicious or reckless misconduct on the part of defendants-respondents (see, Prozeralik v Capital Cities Communications, 82 NY2d 466) and the work allegedly causing damage, to plaintiff’s premises was performed by independent contractors. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Emily Goodman, J.), entered September 13, 1996, which granted the motion of defendants Good-Land Management Corp. and Abacus Federal Savings Bank and the cross motion of defendant Mott & Prince Services Corp. for partial summary judgment dismissing plaintiff’s claim for punitive damages, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

The court properly granted the cross motions to dismiss the punitive damages claim since the record is devoid of evidence of malicious or reckless misconduct on the part of defendants-respondents (see, Prozeralik v Capital Cities Communications, 82 NY2d 466) and the work allegedly causing damage, to plaintiff’s premises was performed by independent contractors. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Rosenberger, Ellerin, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

240 A.D.2d 218, 658 N.Y.S.2d 876, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6166, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cres-jewelry-factory-inc-v-good-land-management-corp-nyappdiv-1997.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack