Crepsac v. Owens

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Crepsac v. Owens

256 A.D.2d 301, 681 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13217

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 7, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 256 A.D.2d 301 (Crepsac v. Owens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crepsac v. Owens, 256 A.D.2d 301, 681 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13217 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), dated April 10, 1998, as denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiffs did not sustain serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that there is an issue of fact as to whether the plaintiffs sustained serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, e.g., Stark v Amadio, 239 AD2d 569; Rosmarin v Lamontanaro, 238 AD2d 567; Flanagan v Hoeg, 212 AD2d 756). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant appeals, as limited by her brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Schmidt, J.), dated April 10, 1998, as denied her motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint on the ground that the plaintiffs did not sustain serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d).

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

We agree with the Supreme Court that there is an issue of fact as to whether the plaintiffs sustained serious injuries within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d) (see, e.g., Stark v Amadio, 239 AD2d 569; Rosmarin v Lamontanaro, 238 AD2d 567; Flanagan v Hoeg, 212 AD2d 756). Rosenblatt, J. P., O’Brien, Sullivan, Krausman and Florio, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 A.D.2d 301, 681 N.Y.S.2d 760, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13217, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crepsac-v-owens-nyappdiv-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack