Crepeau v. Chao
This text of Crepeau v. Chao (Crepeau v. Chao) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-1057
PATRICIA CREPEAU,
Plaintiff – Appellant,
v.
ELAINE CHAO, Secretary, Department of Labor,
Defendant – Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. Claude M. Hilton, Senior District Judge. (1:06-cv-01308-CMH-TCB)
Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 23, 2009
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Patricia Crepeau, Appellant Pro Se. Catherine DeRoever Wood, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Patricia Crepeau appeals the district court’s order
granting Defendant’s summary judgment motion on her religious
discrimination and sexual harassment claims, brought pursuant to
Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.
§§ 2000e to 2000e-17 (2000), and her claim challenging the Merit
Systems Protection Board’s decision upholding her fifteen-day
employment suspension. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s
order. See Crepeau v. Chao, No. 1:06-cv-01308-CMH-TCB (E.D. Va.
filed Nov. 13, 2007; entered Nov. 14, 2007). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Crepeau v. Chao, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crepeau-v-chao-ca4-2009.