Crenwelge v. Stephens County of

W.D. Oklahoma

Crenwelge v. Stephens County of

DecidedApril 11, 2024

Docket5:23-cv-00042

StatusUnknown

This text of Crenwelge v. Stephens County of (Crenwelge v. Stephens County of) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, W.D. Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Crenwelge v. Stephens County of, (W.D. Okla. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

DAVID SAMUEL CRENWELGE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-23-42-G ) STEPHENS COUNTY et al., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER Plaintiff David Samuel Crenwelge, a state inmate appearing pro se, initiated this civil action on January 11, 2023. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell for preliminary review. Judge Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 4) recommending that this action be dismissed due to Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s order to either pay the required filing fee or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has now filed a submission that the Court liberally construes as an Objection to the Report and Recommendation. See Doc. No. 5. Pursuant to controlling authority, the Court reviews de novo the portions of the R. & R. to which specific objections have been made. See United States v. 2121 E. 30th St., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). In his Objection, Plaintiff argues that he lacks the funds to pay the filing fee and requests that he be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in this matter. See Pl.’s Obj. at 2. Having considered Plaintiff's contentions, the Court finds that Plaintiff should be permitted an opportunity to submit an in forma pauperis application to the Court. CONCLUSION Accordingly, the reasoning of the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 4) is ADOPTED. The Court declines to dismiss this matter at this time. The Clerk of Court is directed to send an in forma pauperis application form to Plaintiff along with a copy of this Order. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, he must complete and return this application to the Court within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this matter without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of April, 2024.

(Vauba B. Kodo United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

DAVID SAMUEL CRENWELGE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. CIV-23-42-G ) STEPHENS COUNTY et al., ) ) Defendants. )

ORDER Plaintiff David Samuel Crenwelge, a state inmate appearing pro se, initiated this civil action on January 11, 2023. In accordance with 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), the matter was referred to Magistrate Judge Gary M. Purcell for preliminary review. Judge Purcell issued a Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 4) recommending that this action be dismissed due to Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court’s order to either pay the required filing fee or seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis. Plaintiff has now filed a submission that the Court liberally construes as an Objection to the Report and Recommendation. See Doc. No. 5. Pursuant to controlling authority, the Court reviews de novo the portions of the R. & R. to which specific objections have been made. See United States v. 2121 E. 30th St., 73 F.3d 1057, 1060 (10th Cir. 1996); 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1); Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b)(3). In his Objection, Plaintiff argues that he lacks the funds to pay the filing fee and requests that he be permitted to proceed in forma pauperis in this matter. See Pl.’s Obj. at 2. Having considered Plaintiff's contentions, the Court finds that Plaintiff should be permitted an opportunity to submit an in forma pauperis application to the Court. CONCLUSION Accordingly, the reasoning of the Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 4) is ADOPTED. The Court declines to dismiss this matter at this time. The Clerk of Court is directed to send an in forma pauperis application form to Plaintiff along with a copy of this Order. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with this action, he must complete and return this application to the Court within fourteen (14) days of the date of this Order. Failure to do so may result in dismissal of this matter without prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED this 11th day of April, 2024.

(Vauba B. Kodo United States District Judge

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Crenwelge v. Stephens County of, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crenwelge-v-stephens-county-of-okwd-2024.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack