Crenshaw v. Warehouse Employees Union, Local 322
This text of 82 F. App'x 837 (Crenshaw v. Warehouse Employees Union, Local 322) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).
Bruce A. Crenshaw appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Crenshaw v. Warehouse Employees Union, Local 322, No. CA-02-794 (E.D.Va. July 15, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the [838]*838facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
82 F. App'x 837, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crenshaw-v-warehouse-employees-union-local-322-ca4-2003.