Crenshaw v. Warehouse Employees Union, Local 322

Fourth Circuit

Crenshaw v. Warehouse Employees Union, Local 322

82 F. App'x 837

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided December 16, 2003·No. No. 03-1884·Published

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Bruce A. Crenshaw appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Crenshaw v. Warehouse Employees Union, Local 322, No. CA-02-794 (E.D.Va. July 15, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the [838] facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNPUBLISHED

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

Bruce A. Crenshaw appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his discrimination action. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. See Crenshaw v. Warehouse Employees Union, Local 322, No. CA-02-794 (E.D.Va. July 15, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the [838] facts and legal contentions are adequately-presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Crenshaw v. Warehouse Employees Union, Local 322, 82 F. App'x 837 (4th Cir. 2003).

Pincite

82 F. App'x 837 (Crenshaw v. Warehouse Employees Union, Local 322) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.