Crenshaw v. Street Railway Co.

52 S.E. 731, 140 N.C. 192, 1905 N.C. LEXIS 28
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 12, 1905
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 52 S.E. 731 (Crenshaw v. Street Railway Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crenshaw v. Street Railway Co., 52 S.E. 731, 140 N.C. 192, 1905 N.C. LEXIS 28 (N.C. 1905).

Opinion

*193 Per Curiam:

Without any intimation as to the plaintiff’s right to recover on' the testimony as it now stands, the court is of opinion that a new trial should be awarded by reason of the newly discovered evidence, set out and referred to in the affidavits of the defendant, filed for the purpose on motion duly made.

Under the decision in Herndon v. Railroad Co., 121 N. C., 498, we never discuss the facts on such motion, but simply award or refuse a new trial.

New Trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brantley v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad
190 S.E. 731 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1937)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
52 S.E. 731, 140 N.C. 192, 1905 N.C. LEXIS 28, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crenshaw-v-street-railway-co-nc-1905.