Crenshaw v. State
506 S.W.3d 393, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1330, 2016 WL 7448315
This text of 506 S.W.3d 393 (Crenshaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Crenshaw v. State, 506 S.W.3d 393, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1330, 2016 WL 7448315 (Mo. Ct. App. 2016).
Opinion
ORDER
Laron Crenshaw appeals from a denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief without an evidentiary hearing. We affirm.
An extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this order pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
506 S.W.3d 393, 2016 Mo. App. LEXIS 1330, 2016 WL 7448315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crenshaw-v-state-moctapp-2016.