Crenshaw v. State

570 So. 2d 349, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7965, 1990 WL 154789
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedOctober 16, 1990
DocketNo. 88-1497
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 570 So. 2d 349 (Crenshaw v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Crenshaw v. State, 570 So. 2d 349, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7965, 1990 WL 154789 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

We need not address the question whether admitting a 911 tape into evidence, where the victim identified the defendant as her assailant, was erroneous. The issue was not preserved for review by a specific contemporaneous objection. Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla.1978).

Because the trial court failed to enter written reasons in support of its departure sentence, the matter must be remanded for resentencing within the guidelines. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990).

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rodriguez v. State
623 So. 2d 1246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Magrans v. State
584 So. 2d 1056 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
570 So. 2d 349, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7965, 1990 WL 154789, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/crenshaw-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.