Crenshaw v. State
570 So. 2d 349, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7965, 1990 WL 154789
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 16, 1990·No. No. 88-1497·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinions
We need not address the question whether admitting a 911 tape into evidence, where the victim identified the defendant as her assailant, was erroneous. The issue was not preserved for review by a specific contemporaneous objection. Castor v. State, 365 So.2d 701 (Fla.1978).
Because the trial court failed to enter written reasons in support of its departure sentence, the matter must be remanded for resentencing within the guidelines. Pope v. State, 561 So.2d 554 (Fla.1990).
Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for resentencing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Crenshaw v. State, 570 So. 2d 349, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 7965, 1990 WL 154789 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).
570 So. 2d 349 (Crenshaw v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rodriguez v. State
623 So. 2d 1246 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1993)
Magrans v. State
584 So. 2d 1056 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)