Cremins v. East Lake Woolen Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Cremins v. East Lake Woolen Co.

40 N.Y.S. 1141

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 29, 1896

StatusPublished

This text of 40 N.Y.S. 1141 (Cremins v. East Lake Woolen Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Cremins v. East Lake Woolen Co., 40 N.Y.S. 1141 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1896).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The moving papers of the junior attaching creditor fail to show that the summons in his action against the defendant had been served or published within the 30 days required by law, and that was necessary under the decision in the case of Ladenburg v. Bank, 2 App. Div. 477, 37 N. Y. Supp. 1085. The order vacating the plaintiff’s attachment must therefore be reversed, with §10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with §10 costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The moving papers of the junior attaching creditor fail to show that the summons in his action against the defendant had been served or published within the 30 days required by law, and that was necessary under the decision in the case of Ladenburg v. Bank, 2 App. Div. 477, 37 N. Y. Supp. 1085. The order vacating the plaintiff’s attachment must therefore be reversed, with §10 costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with §10 costs.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 N.Y.S. 1141, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/cremins-v-east-lake-woolen-co-nyappdiv-1896.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack