Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/Creighton v. Kuttruff

Creighton v. Kuttruff

286 A.D. 987, 144 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4834
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedSeptember 28, 1955
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 286 A.D. 987 (Creighton v. Kuttruff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Creighton v. Kuttruff, 286 A.D. 987, 144 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).

Opinion

Memorandum: In the absence of any showing that the convenience of witnesses on [988]*988either side will be promoted, we feel that the moving papers do not disclose sufficient basis for the exercise of the court’s discretion to change the place of trial from Monroe to Wayne County. All concur. (Appeal from part of an order of Monroe Special Term granting defendant’s motion to change the place of trial of the consolidated action from Monroe County to Wayne County.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Putnam Ranches, Inc. v. O'Neill Production Credit Ass'n
271 N.W.2d 856 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1978)
Sparklin v. Jackson & Perkins Co.
6 Misc. 2d 559 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
286 A.D. 987, 144 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4834, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/creighton-v-kuttruff-nyappdiv-1955.