Creighton v. Kuttruff
286 A.D. 987, 144 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4834
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided September 28, 1955·Published·Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Memorandum: In the absence of any showing that the convenience of witnesses on [988]*988either side will be promoted, we feel that the moving papers do not disclose sufficient basis for the exercise of the court’s discretion to change the place of trial from Monroe to Wayne County. All concur. (Appeal from part of an order of Monroe Special Term granting defendant’s motion to change the place of trial of the consolidated action from Monroe County to Wayne County.) Present — MeCurn, P. J., Kimball, Wheeler and Van Duser, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Creighton v. Kuttruff, 286 A.D. 987, 144 N.Y.S.2d 450, 1955 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4834 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1955).
286 A.D. 987 (Creighton v. Kuttruff) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Putnam Ranches, Inc. v. O'Neill Production Credit Ass'n
271 N.W.2d 856 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1978)
Sparklin v. Jackson & Perkins Co.
6 Misc. 2d 559 (New York Supreme Court, 1957)