Creighton v. Hewitt
This text of 51 Ga. 174 (Creighton v. Hewitt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
We do not think this verdict comes within the class of verdicts which the judge of the superior court is authorized to set aside. It is not contrary to the evidence, if the witnesses are to he believed, and under our law the jury are specially the judges of that matter. We will not say that there is no case where the judge may not grant a new trial, when credibility of witnesses is the turning point of the case; but in this case, there seems to be nothing but the simple belief of the judge that the woman who saw Mr. Hewitt did not tell the truth, and- the improbability that a man occupying the station in life of the defendant would do so dastardly an act as this. It is clear, however, that somebody did it. It is clear, too, that the defendant was in a rage at the plaintiff, and it is difficult to see how the thing done could have been done except, at least, by the consent of the defendant. Taking all the circumstances together as they appear in the record, we do not think the verdict displays passion, prejudice or mistake, but it is such a verdict as twelve honest, sensible men might well render, though others might differ with them.
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
51 Ga. 174, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/creighton-v-hewitt-ga-1874.