Cregin v. Brooklyn Crosstown Railroad

26 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 349

New York Supreme Court·Decided December 15, 1879·Published

Opinion

Dykman, J.:

The order appealed from should be affirmed.

The first trial was before a court having jurisdiction, and there was a verdict had.

The disqualification of the trial judge was an irregularity which prevented the entry of judgment, but it cannot deprive the suc■cessful party of his costs.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Present — Gilbert, and Dykman, JJ.

Order denying retaxation affirmed, with ten dollars costs and •disbursements.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Dykman, J.:

The order appealed from should be affirmed.

The first trial was before a court having jurisdiction, and there was a verdict had.

The disqualification of the trial judge was an irregularity which prevented the entry of judgment, but it cannot deprive the suc■cessful party of his costs.

Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements.

Present — Gilbert, and Dykman, JJ.

Order denying retaxation affirmed, with ten dollars costs and •disbursements.

Cregin v. Brooklyn Crosstown Railroad, 26 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 349 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1879).

Pincite

26 N.Y. Sup. Ct. 349 (Cregin v. Brooklyn Crosstown Railroad) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.