Creel Et Ux. v. Abernethy

136 So. 229, 102 Fla. 460
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided July 11, 1931·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— The transcript of the reeord in this case has no index attached thereto, as is required by the Eules.

The assignments of error present only the question of the correctness of the findings and deeree of the chancellor based on question of fact.

There appears in the record substantial evidence to support the deeree appealed from and, therefore, such decree should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Creel Et Ux. v. Abernethy, 136 So. 229, 102 Fla. 460 (Fla. 1931).

136 So. 229 (Creel Et Ux. v. Abernethy) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Standard Lumber Co. v. Florida Industrial Co.
141 So. 729 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1932)