Creel Et Ux. v. Abernethy

Supreme Court of Florida

Creel Et Ux. v. Abernethy

136 So. 229, 102 Fla. 460

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedJuly 11, 1931

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 136 So. 229 (Creel Et Ux. v. Abernethy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Creel Et Ux. v. Abernethy, 136 So. 229, 102 Fla. 460 (Fla. 1931).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

— The transcript of the reeord in this case has no index attached thereto, as is required by the Eules.

The assignments of error present only the question of the correctness of the findings and deeree of the chancellor based on question of fact.

There appears in the record substantial evidence to support the deeree appealed from and, therefore, such decree should be affirmed. It is so ordered.

Affirmed.

Buford, C.J., and Ellis and Brown, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI