Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Creekmore v. State

Creekmore v. State

798 So. 2d 776, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11920, 2001 WL 957393
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 24, 2001·No. No. 2D00-5021·Published

Opinion

FULMER, Acting Chief Judge.

Johnny Creekmore appeals his convictions for manufacture and possession of cannabis and possession of drug paraphernalia. Trial counsel failed to preserve for appellate review the trial court’s denial of the motion to suppress evidence; therefore, we do not decide the merit of this issue. See Pendarvis v. State, 752 So.2d 75, 76 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000).

Affirmed.

GREEN and SILBERMAN, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Creekmore v. State, 798 So. 2d 776, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 11920, 2001 WL 957393 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).

798 So. 2d 776 (Creekmore v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Pendarvis v. State
752 So. 2d 75 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)