Creekmore v. PSCH, Inc.

60 A.D.3d 585, 874 N.Y.S.2d 907
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 31, 2009·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

— Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Martin Shulman, J.), entered April 4, 2008, which, after an in camera document review, directed nonparty appellant Creed-moor Psychiatric Center to produce redacted copies of 10 of the 93 documents requested by defendant, unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The motion court providently exercised its discretion in determining that redacted versions of 10 of the documents, purportedly subject to the statutory privilege afforded by Education Law § 6527 (3), are probative, material and necessary to aid defendant in its defense of this action, where appellant failed to demonstrate that it would suffer any prejudice by their production to defendant (see CPLR 3103; Education Law § 6527 [3]). Concur — Gonzalez, P.J., Tom, Sweeny, Catterson and Renwick, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Creekmore v. PSCH, Inc., 60 A.D.3d 585, 874 N.Y.S.2d 907 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

60 A.D.3d 585 (Creekmore v. PSCH, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Newman v. Mount Sinai Med. Ctr., Inc.
2022 NY Slip Op 03327 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)