Creek Bank & Trust Co. v. Johnson

1912 OK 662, 127 P. 480, 33 Okla. 696, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 776
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided October 22, 1912·No. 1853·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

On July 3, 1908, Jesse Ripley, doing business in Sapulpa, being indebted to the Creek Bank & Trust Company, plaintiff in error, in the sum of $1,441.19, executed to it a chattel mortgage on his stock of groceries, two mules, a delivery wagon, and a set of double harness, and on November 17, 1908, the same was duly filed with the register, of deeds of Creek county as required by law. On November 21, 1908, after condition broken, the mortgaged property, together with his notes and fixtures, were turned over by Ripley to the mortgagee. Shortly thereafter, defendants in error sued the bank for the amount of their account, alleging that it had assumed the payment of the debt at the time of taking over the mortgaged property, which the bank denied. There was trial to a jury and judgment for plaintiffs before a justice of the peace, and later before the county court to which the case was appealed, and the bank brings the case here. There being evidence reasonably tending to support the verdict, the judgment of the trial court is affirmed.

There is no merit in the remaining assignments of error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Creek Bank & Trust Co. v. Johnson, 1912 OK 662, 127 P. 480, 33 Okla. 696, 1912 Okla. LEXIS 776 (Okla. 1912).

1912 OK 662 (Creek Bank & Trust Co. v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kansas, O. & G. Ry. Co. v. Dillon
1942 OK 174 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1942)
St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Clampitt
1916 OK 994 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1915)
St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Long
1913 OK 751 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
White v. Putnam
1913 OK 524 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Newburn
1913 OK 499 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)