Creedon v. Wilson
This text of 10 F.R.D. 488 (Creedon v. Wilson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This action 1 is almost identical to Creedon v. Polis, D.C.E.D.Pa., 7 F.R.D. 652. For the reasons stated by Judge Bard in his opinion, the defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint is denied and an order may be entered directing that the persons to whom the Housing Expediter has requested that restitution be tendered be added as a party plaintiff in this action so that any counterclaim of the defendants relating to the cause of action may be asserted against, but not to exceed, the claim of the plaintiff.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
10 F.R.D. 488, 1948 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/creedon-v-wilson-paed-1948.