Creedon v. State

732 So. 2d 485, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6762, 1999 WL 330190
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedMay 26, 1999
DocketNo. 98-00396
StatusPublished

This text of 732 So. 2d 485 (Creedon v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Creedon v. State, 732 So. 2d 485, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6762, 1999 WL 330190 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Jane M. Creedon appeals her convictions for possession of methamphetamine, misdemeanor possession of cannabis and possession of drug paraphernalia. Based on the unique facts presented in the case, we agree with Creedon’s argument that the trial court erred in denying her motion to suppress. The record does not support a finding that Creedon’s consent was freely and voluntarily given.

Accordingly, we reverse and remand with directions to the trial court to grant [486]*486Creedon’s motion to suppress and to discharge her.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and BLUE, and FULMER, J., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
732 So. 2d 485, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 6762, 1999 WL 330190, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/creedon-v-state-fladistctapp-1999.