Creedon v. Condor Manufacturing Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Creedon v. Condor Manufacturing Co.

235 A.D. 625, 254 N.Y.S. 821

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 15, 1932

StatusPublished

This text of 235 A.D. 625 (Creedon v. Condor Manufacturing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Creedon v. Condor Manufacturing Co., 235 A.D. 625, 254 N.Y.S. 821 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1932).

Pincite

Opinion

Order granting plaintiff a preference reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The plaintiff receiver, appointed by a court of a foreign State, is not such a receiver as is entitled to a preference under section 138, subdivision 7, of the Civil Practice Act. (Hough v. Canfield, 54 App. Div. 510: Daly v. Wood, 29 Misc. 105.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order granting plaintiff a preference reversed on the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs. The plaintiff receiver, appointed by a court of a foreign State, is not such a receiver as is entitled to a preference under section 138, subdivision 7, of the Civil Practice Act. (Hough v. Canfield, 54 App. Div. 510: Daly v. Wood, 29 Misc. 105.) Lazansky, P. J., Young, Kapper, Hagarty and Carswell, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

235 A.D. 625, 254 N.Y.S. 821, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/creedon-v-condor-manufacturing-co-nyappdiv-1932.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack