Creed v. Stokes

331 S.E.2d 351, 285 S.C. 542, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 443
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedJune 10, 1985
Docket22341
StatusPublished
Cited by20 cases

This text of 331 S.E.2d 351 (Creed v. Stokes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Creed v. Stokes, 331 S.E.2d 351, 285 S.C. 542, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 443 (S.C. 1985).

Opinion

Gregory, Justice:

Appellant C. W. Stokes appeals in this boundary dispute. The master and trial judge ruled respondents had established title to the disputed property by adverse possession. We affirm.

Stokes’ only contention is the lower court erred in ordering this matter referred to the master. He correctly contends he had a right to a jury trial since this was a land title dispute. See S. C. Const. Art. I, § 14.

However, appellant waived his objection to the order of reference. Though he opposed the order, he failed *543 to appeal from it. The order was not interlocutory, and should have been appealed immediately because it affected the mode of trial, a substantial right. S. C. Code Ann. § 14-3-330(2) (1976); Pelfrey v. Bank of Greer, 270 S. C. 691, 244 S. E. (2d) 315 (1978). The order became law of the case once appellant failed to timely appeal.

The order of the lower court is accordingly,

Affirmed.

Littlejohn, C. J., and Ness, Harwell and Chandler, J.J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Maybank 2754, LLC v. Eugene J. Zurlo
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2024
Federal National Mortgage v. Dalen
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2019
Vanderbilt Mortgage v. Bull
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2018
Neeltec Enterprises, Inc. v. Long
725 S.E.2d 926 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2012)
Pye v. Holmes
Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2010
Fulmer v. Cain
670 S.E.2d 652 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2008)
Brinkley v. Martin
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2006
Hagood v. Sommerville
607 S.E.2d 707 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2005)
Bateman v. Rouse
596 S.E.2d 386 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2004)
Flagstar Corp. v. Royal Surplus Lines
533 S.E.2d 331 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2000)
Senter v. Piggly Wiggly Carolina Co.
533 S.E.2d 575 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2000)
Breland v. Love Chevrolet Olds, Inc.
529 S.E.2d 11 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2000)
First Union Nat. Bank of SC v. Soden
511 S.E.2d 372 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1998)
Lester v. Dawson
491 S.E.2d 240 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1997)
Blakely v. State Board of Medical Examiners
425 S.E.2d 37 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1993)
Richland County v. Lowman
415 S.E.2d 433 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1992)
PREFERRED SAVINGS BANK, INC. v. Elkholy
399 S.E.2d 19 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1990)
Link v. School District of Pickens County
393 S.E.2d 176 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1990)
Edwards v. Timmons
377 S.E.2d 97 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
331 S.E.2d 351, 285 S.C. 542, 1985 S.C. LEXIS 443, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/creed-v-stokes-sc-1985.