Creed v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Creed v. State

561 So. 2d 1356, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4103, 1990 WL 77237

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 6, 1990

DocketNo. 88-03472

StatusPublished

This text of 561 So. 2d 1356 (Creed v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Creed v. State, 561 So. 2d 1356, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4103, 1990 WL 77237 (Fla. Ct. App. 1990).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the finding of the trial court that appellant violated the terms and conditions of his probation, as well as the sentence imposed therefor. However, the order of violation must be corrected to reflect that appellant was found guilty of violating condition 5 (commission of a new offense), not conditions 1 (failure to submit written reports) and 2 (failure to pay cost of supervision). Appellant was acquitted of these two technical violations.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

We affirm the finding of the trial court that appellant violated the terms and conditions of his probation, as well as the sentence imposed therefor. However, the order of violation must be corrected to reflect that appellant was found guilty of violating condition 5 (commission of a new offense), not conditions 1 (failure to submit written reports) and 2 (failure to pay cost of supervision). Appellant was acquitted of these two technical violations.

THREADGILL, A.C.J., and PARKER and ALTENBERND, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

561 So. 2d 1356, 1990 Fla. App. LEXIS 4103, 1990 WL 77237, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/creed-v-state-fladistctapp-1990.