Creed v. Kendall

31 N.E. 6, 156 Mass. 291, 1892 Mass. LEXIS 198
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedMay 9, 1892
StatusPublished
Cited by10 cases

This text of 31 N.E. 6 (Creed v. Kendall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Creed v. Kendall, 31 N.E. 6, 156 Mass. 291, 1892 Mass. LEXIS 198 (Mass. 1892).

Opinion

Morton, J.

The single question in this case is whether there was contributory negligence on the part of the mother. The case was left to the jury, under instructions as to what would constitute. contributory negligence on her part, to which no exception was taken, and the jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff in each case. We think that the refusal of the court to rule that the evidence showed, as matter of law, that there was contributory negligence by the mother was correct, and that there was evidence to warrant the verdicts of the jury. Gibbons v. Williams, 135 Mass. 333. Marsland v. Murray, 148 Mass. 91. Howland v. Union Street Railway, 150 Mass. 86. Slattery v. O'Connell, 153 Mass. 94. ¡Exceptions overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gravel v. LeBlanc
162 A. 789 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1932)
Grant v. Bangor Railway & Electric Co.
83 A. 121 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1912)
Sullivan v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.
78 N.E. 382 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1906)
O'Brien v. Hudner
65 N.E. 788 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1903)
Cotter v. Lynn & Boston Railroad
61 N.E. 818 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1901)
Butler v. New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad
58 N.E. 592 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1900)
West Chicago St. R. R. v. Liderman
87 Ill. App. 638 (Appellate Court of Illinois, 1900)
McNeil v. Boston Ice Co.
54 N.E. 257 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
Powers v. Quincy & Boston Street Railway Co.
39 N.E. 345 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1895)
Grant v. City of Fitchburg
35 N.E. 84 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1893)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
31 N.E. 6, 156 Mass. 291, 1892 Mass. LEXIS 198, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/creed-v-kendall-mass-1892.