Creech v. . Corbett

41 S.E.2d 743, 227 N.C. 276, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 386
CourtSupreme Court of North Carolina
DecidedMarch 26, 1947
StatusPublished

This text of 41 S.E.2d 743 (Creech v. . Corbett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Creech v. . Corbett, 41 S.E.2d 743, 227 N.C. 276, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 386 (N.C. 1947).

Opinion

Stacy, C. J.

The question for decision is whether the case as made can survive the demurrer to the evidence. Even if it be conceded that the instrument in evidence purporting to be a deed of gift from J. B. *277 Creecb and wife to Louisa H. Hales is void, as tbe trial court concluded, tbis would not perforce dispose of tbe petitioners’ prima facie case.

It is true tbe petitioners claim under tbe reverter clause in tbis instrument. Failing in tbis, however, they claim as beirs of J. B. Creecb. So, taking either born of tbe dilemma, tbe matter would seem to be for tbe twelve.

Then, too, if Louisa H. Hales put tbis paper writing on record, what effect did it have upon tbe character of her possession ? Tbe respondents rely upon her claim of adverse possession. Tbe petitioners say her claim was under tbis registered instrument.

Tbe case is involved in too many contradictions to warrant a nonsuit.

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 S.E.2d 743, 227 N.C. 276, 1947 N.C. LEXIS 386, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/creech-v-corbett-nc-1947.