Credle v. Selsky

46 A.D.3d 989, 846 N.Y.S.2d 797
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedDecember 6, 2007
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 46 A.D.3d 989 (Credle v. Selsky) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Credle v. Selsky, 46 A.D.3d 989, 846 N.Y.S.2d 797 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2007).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of the Commissioner of Correctional Services which found petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

Petitioner failed to produce a urine specimen within the three-[990]*990hour time period allotted after being instructed to do so by a correction officer. As a result, he was charged in a misbehavior report with refusing a direct order and failing to comply with urinalysis testing procedures. Following a tier III disciplinary hearing, petitioner was found guilty of the charges, and the determination was affirmed on administrative appeal. This CPLR article 78 proceeding ensued.

We confirm. The misbehavior report, documentary evidence and testimony at the hearing provide substantial evidence supporting the determination of guilt (see Matter of Levy v Goord, 22 AD3d 929 [2005]). While petitioner maintained that he suffered from a medical condition that rendered him incapable of producing a specimen, this presented a credibility issue for the Hearing Officer to resolve (see id. at 929-930) and, in any event, was not substantiated by the medical testimony given at the hearing. Therefore, we find no reason to disturb the determination of guilt.

Cardona, P.J., Crew III, Carpinello, Rose and Lahtinen, JJ., concur. Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, without costs, and petition dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Redmond v. Fischer
116 A.D.3d 1304 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2014)
White v. Fischer
95 A.D.3d 1582 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)
Taylor v. Fischer
87 A.D.3d 1256 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Genis v. New York State Department of Correctional Services
80 A.D.3d 1032 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2011)
Sterling v. Fischer
75 A.D.3d 709 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Capocetta v. Fischer
72 A.D.3d 1377 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2010)
Silverstein v. Bezio
65 A.D.3d 1424 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Peana v. Fischer
54 A.D.3d 1126 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Thorpe v. Fischer
53 A.D.3d 1003 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
Liakis v. Selsky
50 A.D.3d 1409 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
46 A.D.3d 989, 846 N.Y.S.2d 797, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/credle-v-selsky-nyappdiv-2007.