Creditors v. Cozzens

6 F. Cas. 793, 3 Nat. Bank. Reg. 281
CourtDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri
DecidedJuly 1, 1869
StatusPublished

This text of 6 F. Cas. 793 (Creditors v. Cozzens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. Missouri primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Creditors v. Cozzens, 6 F. Cas. 793, 3 Nat. Bank. Reg. 281 (E.D. Mo. 1869).

Opinion

TREAT, District Judge.

The matter of the contempt committed by McCreery, as well as the merits of the case as between himself and the assignee of Cozzens & Hall, are submitted upon the papers, and the mass of evidence reported by the commissioner. But before passing upon the merits of the case, as between the assignee and McCreery, it is necessary to examine the issues presented by the pleadings, and upon looking at the papers there are no pleadings. The restraining order, issued against a person other than the debtors, by virtue of section 40 of the bankrupt act of 1867 [14 Stat. 536], at the commencement of the proceedings, is temporary only, and is intended to restrain the disposition of the goods and property of the debtor until an adjudication can be had, and an as-signee appointed to take charge of the assets for the benefit of the creditors. The order is in aid of the writ; if the property is in the possession of the debtor, upon the adjudication of bankruptcy, the warrant issues to the marshal to take the property as assets of the debtor; if it is in the hands of a person other than the debtor, and any relief is sought against him, the proper proceedings must be instituted, either by suit at law or bill in equity, so that the court may pass upon the matters, either by a judgment or decree, according to the nature of the case.

In this case, the assignee has not brought, any suit against McCreery; the only proceeding against him is one for contempt in violating the injunction ordered upon the original petition filed against the debtors, with which McCreery had nothing to do; for it was a matter immaterial to him whether the debtors were adjudged to be bankrupt or not, and as a bill in equity the petition would be multifarious. The court, therefore, will take no action upon the case until the proper issues are made up between the parties, so that the court can make either a decree upon bill and answer, or submit the issues of fact to a jury, if relief be sought at law. By the present rules, when a restraining order is asked for at the commencement of the proceedings, against any person other than the debtor, separate petition must be filed, so that the proceedings upon the injunction need not be complicated with those praying the adjudication of bankruptcy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
6 F. Cas. 793, 3 Nat. Bank. Reg. 281, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/creditors-v-cozzens-moed-1869.