Credito Italiano v. Rosenbaum
This text of 246 A.D. 687 (Credito Italiano v. Rosenbaum) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
[688]*688In the first above-entitled action: Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs. No opinion. (Townley and Untermyer, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and deny plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.)
Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.; Townley and Untermyer, JJ., dissent.
In the second above-entitled action: Orders and judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. (Townley and Untermyer, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and deny plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.)
Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.; Townley and Untermyer, JJ., dissent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
246 A.D. 687, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/credito-italiano-v-rosenbaum-nyappdiv-1935.