Credito Italiano v. Rosenbaum

246 A.D. 687
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 1935·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

[688] In the first above-entitled action: Judgment and orders affirmed, with costs. No opinion. (Townley and Untermyer, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and deny plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.)

Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.; Townley and Untermyer, JJ., dissent.

In the second above-entitled action: Orders and judgment affirmed, with costs. No opinion. (Townley and Untermyer, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and deny plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment.)

Present — Martin, P. J., Merrell, Townley, Glennon and Untermyer, JJ.; Townley and Untermyer, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Credito Italiano v. Rosenbaum, 246 A.D. 687 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1935).

246 A.D. 687 (Credito Italiano v. Rosenbaum) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. Russo Asiatic Bank
160 Misc. 417 (New York Supreme Court, 1936)