Credit Union of Minneapolis Board of Realtors v. Ralston

206 N.W.2d 657, 296 Minn. 491, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1241
Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided April 20, 1973·No. 43917·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

*492 Per Curiam.

Appeal from an order of the Hennepin County Municipal Court granting summary judgment to plaintiff, Credit Union of Minneapolis Board of Realtors.

The order from which the appeal was taken is not appealable. Rule 103.03, Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, lists those orders from which appeals may be taken to this court. We have held that an order granting a motion for summary judgment is interlocutory and not appealable under Rule 103.03. In re Estate and Guardianships of Williams, 254 Minn. 272, 95 N. W. 2d 91 (1959); Johnson & Peterson, Inc. v. Toohey, 289 Minn. 362, 184 N. W. 2d 586 (1971). The appeal, in any event, is without merit.

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Credit Union of Minneapolis Board of Realtors v. Ralston, 206 N.W.2d 657, 296 Minn. 491, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1241 (Mich. 1973).

206 N.W.2d 657 (Credit Union of Minneapolis Board of Realtors v. Ralston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Graupmann v. Rental Equipment & Sales Co.
425 N.W.2d 861 (Court of Appeals of Minnesota, 1988)
Harrington v. County of Ramsey
279 N.W.2d 791 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1979)