Credit Union of Minneapolis Board of Realtors v. Ralston
This text of 206 N.W.2d 657 (Credit Union of Minneapolis Board of Realtors v. Ralston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from an order of the Hennepin County Municipal Court granting summary judgment to plaintiff, Credit Union of Minneapolis Board of Realtors.
The order from which the appeal was taken is not appealable. Rule 103.03, Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, lists those orders from which appeals may be taken to this court. We have held that an order granting a motion for summary judgment is interlocutory and not appealable under Rule 103.03. In re Estate and Guardianships of Williams, 254 Minn. 272, 95 N. W. 2d 91 (1959); Johnson & Peterson, Inc. v. Toohey, 289 Minn. 362, 184 N. W. 2d 586 (1971). The appeal, in any event, is without merit.
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
206 N.W.2d 657, 296 Minn. 491, 1973 Minn. LEXIS 1241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/credit-union-of-minneapolis-board-of-realtors-v-ralston-minn-1973.