Credit Motors, Inc. v. Hogan
This text of 841 S.W.2d 360 (Credit Motors, Inc. v. Hogan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Texas Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In this lease dispute, two employees of Credit Motors, Inc. were identified by name in Michael Hogan’s answers to interrogatories as persons having knowledge of relevant facts. Because their addresses and phone numbers were omitted, the trial court refused to permit Hogan to call them as witnesses. Tex.R.Civ.P. 215, subd. 5. The court of appeals reversed. 827 S.W.2d 392.
In denying the application for writ of error, we are not to be construed as ap[361]*361proving or disapproving the court of appeals’ reliance on TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell, 811 S.W.2d 913 (Tex.1991), in determining whether the trial court properly excluded the testimony of these witnesses.
The application for writ of error is denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
841 S.W.2d 360, 36 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 125, 1992 Tex. LEXIS 140, 1992 WL 310013, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/credit-motors-inc-v-hogan-tex-1992.