Credit Motors, Inc. v. Hogan

841 S.W.2d 360, 36 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 125, 1992 Tex. LEXIS 140, 1992 WL 310013
Texas Supreme Court·Decided October 28, 1992·No. No. D-2327·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In this lease dispute, two employees of Credit Motors, Inc. were identified by name in Michael Hogan’s answers to interrogatories as persons having knowledge of relevant facts. Because their addresses and phone numbers were omitted, the trial court refused to permit Hogan to call them as witnesses. Tex.R.Civ.P. 215, subd. 5. The court of appeals reversed. 827 S.W.2d 392.

In denying the application for writ of error, we are not to be construed as ap[361]*361proving or disapproving the court of appeals’ reliance on TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. Powell, 811 S.W.2d 913 (Tex.1991), in determining whether the trial court properly excluded the testimony of these witnesses.

The application for writ of error is denied.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Credit Motors, Inc. v. Hogan, 841 S.W.2d 360, 36 Tex. Sup. Ct. J. 125, 1992 Tex. LEXIS 140, 1992 WL 310013 (Tex. 1992).

841 S.W.2d 360 (Credit Motors, Inc. v. Hogan) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Mayfield v. Peek
546 S.W.3d 253 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2017)
Boone v. LeGalley
29 S.W.3d 614 (Court of Appeals of Texas, 2000)