Credit Alliance Corp. v. Dellenoci
This text of 1 D.C. 99 (Credit Alliance Corp. v. Dellenoci) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District of Columbia Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM OPINION
On Motion for Receiver:
Although there is no appearance or opposition by or on the behalf of the sole defendant, the bill shows that others [100]*100holding prior liens have an interest in the property, which of course makes the appointment of a receiver and sale of the property a matter of concern to them. They should be made parties. The bill fails to show any value to the property above such prior liens. For these reasons the motion for a receiver is denied, but without prejudice to renew the same if the bill is reformed to overcome the foregoing deficiencies.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
1 D.C. 99, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/credit-alliance-corp-v-dellenoci-dc-1933.