Creative Space Solutions, Inc. v. Pelino

174 So. 3d 622, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13672, 2015 WL 5438520
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 16, 2015·No. No. 1D15-1388·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Based on Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg, 122 So.3d 440 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we AFFIRM. In so doing, we certify that our disposition of the instant case passes upon the same question we certified in Westphal. Id. at 448. See Jollie v. State, 405 So.2d 418, 421 n. * (Fla.1981). We do not reach the issue of reclassification of benefits, because such is premature in this case. See Quail Ridge v. Johnson, 584 So.2d 199 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991).

LEWIS, WETHERELL, and MAEAR, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Creative Space Solutions, Inc. v. Pelino, 174 So. 3d 622, 2015 Fla. App. LEXIS 13672, 2015 WL 5438520 (Fla. Ct. App. 2015).

174 So. 3d 622 (Creative Space Solutions, Inc. v. Pelino) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Quail Ridge v. Johnson
584 So. 2d 199 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
Jollie v. State
405 So. 2d 418 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1981)
Westphal v. City of St. Petersburg/City of St. Petersburg Risk Management
122 So. 3d 440 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2013)