Creative Designs International, Ltd. v. Bella Products Pty, Ltd.

68 A.D.3d 414, 888 N.Y.2d 743

This text of 68 A.D.3d 414 (Creative Designs International, Ltd. v. Bella Products Pty, Ltd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Creative Designs International, Ltd. v. Bella Products Pty, Ltd., 68 A.D.3d 414, 888 N.Y.2d 743 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2009).

Opinion

After the instant appeal was perfected, the Australian court granted plaintiffs motion to stay all proceedings in the Australian action pending resolution of the action in Supreme Court. Plaintiff thus having obtained the injunctive relief it requested, a determination of this appeal would not affect the rights of the parties (see Matter of Johnson v Pataki, 91 NY2d 214, 222 [1997]). We note that none of the exceptions to the mootness doctrine exist here (see Matter of Hearst Corp. v Clyne, 50 NY2d 707, 714-715 [1980]). Concur — Tom, J.P, Sweeny, Moskowitz, Acosta and Abdus-Salaam, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

MATTER OF JOHNSON v. Pataki
691 N.E.2d 1002 (New York Court of Appeals, 1997)
Hearst Corp. v. Clyne
409 N.E.2d 876 (New York Court of Appeals, 1980)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
68 A.D.3d 414, 888 N.Y.2d 743, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/creative-designs-international-ltd-v-bella-products-pty-ltd-nyappdiv-2009.