Creathers v. Armour & Co.

232 N.W.2d 245, 305 Minn. 510, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1363
CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota
DecidedAugust 8, 1975
DocketNo. 45187
StatusPublished

This text of 232 N.W.2d 245 (Creathers v. Armour & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Creathers v. Armour & Co., 232 N.W.2d 245, 305 Minn. 510, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1363 (Mich. 1975).

Opinion

Per Cueiam.

The employer seeks review of a decision of the Workmen’s Compensation Commission awarding benefits to the employee for permanent and total disability. The compensation judge awarded the employee benefits for temporary total disability but found that his permanent and total disability was not work related. His decision was affirmed by an evenly divided commission.1

On February 25, 1974, the commission granted the employee’s petition to reargue the appeal before the full commission. On this review of the commission’s subsequent decision, the employer argues that the commission abused its discretion in permitting the reargument and that the award is not supported by credible medical testimony.

In Wever v. Farmhand, Inc. 302 Minn. 546, 224 N. W. 2d 162 (1974), we remanded for reconsideration before the full commission an equally divided determination made during the same period of vacancy as that in this case. The commission’s action herein was within its discretion and is affirmed.

The employee has several physical illnesses of a degenerative nature. Five medical experts, differing substantially in opinion, testified as to the causal relationship between employee’s work activities and his permanent and total disability. Resolution of conflict in the opinions of medical experts is to be resolved by the commission as trier of fact. Grabowski v. Great Northern Oil Co. 283 Minn. 205, 167 N. W. 2d 14 (1969). The commission’s finding that injuries sustained by employee in his employment are significant and substantial contributing causes of his total disability is supported by substantial evidence and must be affirmed. Strei v. Church of St. Joseph, 290 Minn. 565, 188 N. W. 2d 879 (1971).

Respondent is allowed $350 attorneys fees on this appeal.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wever v. Farmhand, Inc.
224 N.W.2d 162 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1974)
Grabowski v. Great Northern Oil Company
167 N.W.2d 14 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1969)
Strei v. Church of St. Joseph
188 N.W.2d 879 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
232 N.W.2d 245, 305 Minn. 510, 1975 Minn. LEXIS 1363, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/creathers-v-armour-co-minn-1975.