Creamer v. State
This text of 546 So. 2d 461 (Creamer v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant contends that the sentences in Circuit Court Case No. 87-485 and Circuit Court Case No. 87-1545 were erroneously not designated as concurrent to one another in accordance with his plea bargain and with the court’s oral pronouncement at sentencing. Since the sentence for 87-1545 specifically orders that it shall run concurrent with the sentence in 87-485, we af[462]*462firm. Any alleged error as to the sentence imposed in Circuit Court Case No. 84-1564 cannot be addressed as that sentence is not before us as part of this appeal.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
546 So. 2d 461, 14 Fla. L. Weekly 1723, 1989 Fla. App. LEXIS 4110, 1989 WL 81235, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/creamer-v-state-fladistctapp-1989.