Creamer v. Florida Parole Commission

60 So. 3d 474, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5482, 2011 WL 1415293
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 14, 2011·No. 1D10-3120·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, an inmate of the state correctional system, seeks review of a final declaratory judgment holding that Florida Administrative Code Rule 23-21.0155, addressing extraordinary review by the Flor *475 ida Parole Commission of a prisoner’s eligibility for parole, is a valid exercise of delegated legislative authority, and an earlier interlocutory order denying appellant’s motion to waive the filing fee. We affirm the final declaratory judgment without further discussion. However, based on Florida Parole Commission v. Spagiano, 48 So.3d 714 (Fla.2010), we reverse the order denying appellant’s motion to waive the filing fee.

AFFIRMED IN PART and REVERSED IN PART.

BENTON, C.J., WEBSTER, and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Creamer v. Florida Parole Commission, 60 So. 3d 474, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 5482, 2011 WL 1415293 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

60 So. 3d 474 (Creamer v. Florida Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Florida Parole Commission v. Spaziano
48 So. 3d 714 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2010)